Future of the College Football Playoff: Why 14 Teams Makes Sense

09/24/2025

Future of the College Football Playoff: Why 14 Teams Makes Sense

By Ovi Muniz, 4 Downs 3 Counts CCO/EP

The College Football Playoff (CFP) Management Committee met this week at Big Ten headquarters in Rosemont, Illinois, and according to Heather Dinich of ESPN, there is still no finalized plan for what the CFP will look like beyond 2026. After more than four hours of discussion, the committee only spent about 20 minutes talking format. What we know so far:

  • The committee must notify ESPN by December 1 if they intend to expand beyond 12 teams.

  • Multiple proposals remain on the table, from sticking with 12 to considering more dramatic expansions.

  • No full meeting is scheduled for the rest of 2025, meaning the next major decisions could come around the national championship in January.

For now, the safe bet is the 12-team playoff sticking around. But should it?

Why 14 Teams Is the Right Move

The 12-team model is a step forward, but a 14-team CFP format offers a better balance between fairness, excitement, and scheduling.

  1. Only Two Byes

    • In the current 12-team design, the top four teams receive byes. That sounds rewarding on paper, but last season all four bye teams lost their first playoff game. Momentum matters, and too much rest can backfire.

    • A 14-team system limits byes to the top two seeds only, rewarding elite performance while keeping most teams active.

  2. Six Automatic Bids for Conference Champions

    • Conference titles should matter. Guaranteeing six spots (Power 4 champs plus the two highest Group of 5 champs) protects the integrity of conference play without overloading the bracket.

    • The remaining eight spots go to at-large bids, ensuring strong teams in competitive leagues don't get left out.

  3. Four-Week Structure

    • Round of 14 → Quarterfinals → Semifinals → National Championship.

    • This format fits neatly into a five-week calendar with one gap week before the championship, giving players time to recover and networks time to build hype.

Are Byes an Advantage or Disadvantage?

Traditionally, a bye is considered a reward: teams rest, recover, and prepare. But college football tells a different story. With longer layoffs, top seeds often lose rhythm while their opponents enter sharper and battle-tested.

  • NFL Data: Byes can help, but wild-card teams often ride momentum to upsets.

  • College Football: The sample size is small, but last season proved the risk. All four bye teams went down early, raising serious questions about whether too much rest hurts more than it helps.

By limiting byes to just two teams, a 14-team playoff reduces this problem and still honors the nation's two best programs.

Final Take

The CFP committee may be leaning toward stability with the 12-team model, but the evidence points to a better solution: 14 teams, only two byes, six automatic qualifiers, and a four-week schedule.

This structure ensures fairness, keeps momentum alive, rewards regular-season excellence, and gives fans the most competitive matchups college football can offer.

The CFP's future is undecided — but if the goal is the best playoff possible, 14 is the magic number.