CFP Chaos: A Broken Process, a Furious Notre Dame, and a System in Need of Reform
Here's the truth: Notre Dame and Miami were always going to be compared. But the committee didn't need to pretend for four weeks only to flip the script on selection night.
If the ACC wasn't strong enough, say it.
If Miami's head-to-head was always the trump card, say it.
If nonconference strength mattered more than conference play, say it.
But instead, the committee hid behind vague justifications and contradictory explanations.
Let's face it:
The ACC is not great.
There was no pressing need to force an ACC team into the playoff picture.
Alabama going up after losing badly to Georgia makes zero sense.
If the committee wanted to reward quality losses, then BYU should have stayed higher after dominating for most of the season.
If you're looking for the "best four," Vanderbilt deserved more consideration than Miami.
Two losses. Stronger schedule. Better metrics. A legitimate argument.
This feels rigged—not for corruption, but for narrative.
And now?
Notre Dame refusing bowl eligibility will set a precedent. If a team feels the committee wronged them, why should they participate in a consolation game that makes the CFP millions while they get nothing in return? This is a quiet protest—but a powerful one.
The CFP Needs a Commissioner and Real Rules
The system was supposed to be better than the BCS and better than the old poll-based era. But with human bias, shifting criteria, and a lack of accountability, we're seeing:
-
Drastic errors in judgment
-
No transparency
-
Inconsistent application of rules
-
Personal interpretation outweighing on-field results
The solution?
College Football needs a Commissioner.
Someone who oversees the sport, enforces standards, and removes ambiguity.
The Playoff needs clear, binding eligibility rules.
Not philosophical guidelines. Not weekly improv.
Actual regulations outlining:
-
Required strength of schedule
-
Ranked win criteria
-
Penalties for bad losses
-
Head-to-head weighting
-
Nonconference requirements
When billions of dollars and legacies are on the line, "we thought Miami looked better this week" is unacceptable.
Final Thought
This year's CFP decision wasn't just controversial—it was damaging. It undermined trust in the system, alienated a blue-blood program, and exposed deep flaws in the selection process.
Notre Dame has every right to be angry.
Fans have every right to be confused.
And the sport has every reason to demand major reform.
The playoff is expanding, but the problems are growing too.
If college football wants to maintain credibility, it needs more than 12 teams—